Thursday, December 3, 2009

Holiday Technology (Gifts, Fun, Resources)

I'm compiling a list of websites that offer holiday themed technology. Feel free to add your own ideas in the comments section, and I'm sure I'll be adding to this as time goes on!
  1. Send a free "snail mail" gift card with THIS WEBSITE from the folks at Google!
  2. Create a WORDLE of your loved ones favorite song or wedding vows, print it, and frame it for a unique Christmas Gift.
  3. Visit Paperbackswap.com and trade your used books for "new to you" books. All you pay is shipping to ship your books to another person. When you choose books, people ship them to you for free!
  4. If you haven't visited ELFYOURSELF before, you'll want to go there immediately!
  5. MAKE YOUR OWN SNOWFLAKE with this Flash Website.
  6. Directions for How to MAKE YOUR OWN SNOW GLOBE!
  7. Find the songs that were popular when your loved ones were young and then download them with iTunes and make a custom CD as a gift!
  8. Watch HOLIDAY FAVORITE shows and movies on ABC Family!
  9. Download FREE CHRISTMAS MUSIC in Amazon.com's 25 days of Free Music!
  10. Tell a story online and SHARE YOUR STORY with your friends and family with Storybird.
  11. Create UNIQUE HOLIDAY CARDS at Animoto.com.
  12. (NEW 12/07/09) Download 99 Holiday Classics at Amazon for just $5! (You read that right! 99 songs for $5! Great deal!)
I'll add more soon!


...

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

Who's Failing Who?

Tonight in a workshop on differentiated instruction, I was talking with a teacher about her son who is a high school senior.  She talked about how smart her son was but that he was failing virtually every subject at school.  The reason? Homework.

The kid just doesn't do it. 

I asked her how he did on tests.  She said very well.  I asked her if this was something new, this "not doing homework" thing.  She said no, that it had been ongoing since elementary school.

I told her that her son was not a failure.

It's him that's being failed by a system that is hell bent on holding kids accountable for behaviors with grades.  The doing of homework is a behavior.  It is an action associated with continuing practice, but not all kids need it.  I told her that this story was perfectly applicable to our purposes here tonight.  The "DOING" of homework is a process oriented task that leads, usually, to a formative assessment of the understanding of the material taught.

Formative assessment is meant to drive instructional practice to ensure that the learning is sticking and if not, establish a plan for reteaching, reframing, or restructuring how the material is going to get into a kid's brain.

It is not meant to be punitive.

Grades that reflect behavioral actions or that are punitive are WRONG. 

Let me say that a different way.  If our collective objectives are to teach students, then what we teach and what they LEARN are the priority factors, correct?  How we teach and how kids learn are as individual and unique as the way we look.  If a kid needed extra time because of a reading problem, we would accommodate.  If a kid needed a special adaptive technology, we would accommodate.  If a kid needed additional copies of notes or specific after school support, we would accommodate.

But when a kid demonstrates, time and again, that homework just isn't their bag, why do teachers exclude that from the list of things for which we would accommodate?  There are many ways to differentiate process and product besides homework, but many teachers would rather call the student irresponsible and then punish them with low grades that DO NOT REFLECT WHAT THE KID KNOWS.

Why do teachers get hung up on this?  Does the kid who doesn't do homework deserve not to graduate? 

Why is homework such a dominant factor in the overall grade?

I'm not saying that homework doesn't have a place.  I'm just saying that some kids don't need it.  It's a perfect opportunity to differentiate instructional strategies and provide opportunities for students to do things in different ways.  I'm not talking about more work for some, less work for others, I'm talking about truly understanding a kid's needs to the point of blazing new trails of instructional strategies that may be outside of our own experiences and/or traditions.  The way that things have always been done is a poor excuse for continuing to do them.  There are other ways to hold kids accountable for their learning without punishing them with bad grades because they are a poor fit for an instructional strategy chosen by a teacher, by a professional who should know more than one way to skin a cat, so to speak.

In this holiday season, I'm reminded of a certain reindeer who was pushed out of the traditional learning path and took a different path to proficiency. What Rudolph learned in the nontraditional way served him so well that he became the most successful and famous reindeer of all.  Can't we create opportunities/choices for our students like that?

Like much in education today, homework needs to be reframed.  It's part of the paradigm that needs to be majorly shifted.


Ten years from now, I have a feeling, we are going to look back at many of the practices we participate in today, and be embarrassed by what we did to kids.

Tuesday, December 1, 2009

New Web Stuff 12/02/2009


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Differentiated Instruction

A few of the workshops I'm doing over the course of the next few weeks involve differentiated instructional practices.  I'm doing them as a "coaching" model where I work with just a couple of teachers at a time and look at a particular area that they want to improve, develop a plan and help them implement it, then reflect on how it worked. 

During the course of my time with these teachers, I'll be sharing a couple of resources for developing our plans using technology.  They may or may not come up with every teacher, but I thought I would share some of the resources here, with you!


I'll add more as we uncover what teachers need during my sessions.  We will be discussing what we can differentiate and why we do it.  Additionally, any new websites I save will be in my Delicious account and tagged with "differentiation."

...

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

New Web Stuff 11/26/2009


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

NYSCATE 2009 Virtual Field Trip

I created a "Delicious" Field Trip of a lot of the neat new webby things I discovered at NYSCATE this year.  Several of these new tools may warrant their own blog post soon, but I didn't want to wait to share them.  It was great to meet a bunch of folks from my own Personal Learning Network and it's making me excited for ASCD in March, when I get to see everybody again!  Since many of you in education are on vacation for the rest of this week, here's something to explore besides all the Black Friday bargains:

http://delicious.com/mikefisher821/NYSCATE09

If you are interested in learning more about creating tagged field trips, there is information HERE and HERE.

Sunday, November 15, 2009

New Bloom's Visual for Technology Tools

Sorry it's been awhile since I've blogged properly.  I've let Diigo blog for me these last couple of weeks as I've hit a busy stride.  I've created several new wikis and am building a couple of new workshops for the late Fall, early Spring.  Additionally, I've been reviewing a couple of professional development books that are going to knock your socks off when they are published next summer!

That said, the reason for this post is an updated version of the Visual Bloom's for Technology Tools.  (Next section from my wiki at http://visualblooms.wikispaces.com) :
 I want the visual representation to be more fluid than the above, where web tools can live on different levels and change levels, depending on their usage. I'm sure we could make a case for each of the tools to live in each realm of the hierarchy but in the interest of time and space, I created the following. The arrows are meant to indicate the fluidity with which the tools can travel through the different levels. The middle line is meant to separate the higher cognitive levels from the lower ones, but only with the understanding that it would be for that particular tool on a particular level, and does not consider the multiple ways that the tool could possibly be used. Again, this is meant to be a discussion starter as we evolve the representation of web tools with visuals that are meant to help us understand the interconnectedness of technology resources.  

 This is based on the 2009 "25 Tools" list which is available here: http://www.c4lpt.co.uk/25Tools/index.html


Saturday, November 7, 2009

New Web Stuff 11/08/2009


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Saturday, October 24, 2009

New Web Stuff 10/25/2009


Posted from Diigo. The rest of my favorite links are here.

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Protocols for Professional Learning Book Review

This is a repost of a review I wrote of Protocols for Professional Learning by Lois Brown Easton for the Teacher Leader's Network, which was originally posted here: http://www.teacherleaders.org/node/4519 (You may have to be signed in to TLN to access.)

A Book to Inspire a Culture of Trust and Build Teacher Community
Author: Teacher Leaders Network Forum
Keywords: Book Reviews Coaching & Mentoring Prof. Communities Prof. Development teacher leadership teacher_leadership Teaching Quality

Protocols for Professional Learning (The Professional Learning Community Series)
By Lois Brown Easton
(2009, ASCD)

Reviewed by Michael Fisher
Instructional Coach and Consultant (New York)
Teacher Leaders Network

I appreciate the opportunity to read and review Lois Brown Easton’s book on Professional Learning Protocols. It is a book that I know will have an impact on my own practice as a staff developer, and I’ve already used and shared many ideas from the text.

Because I work with schools helping teachers to set up Professional Learning Networks, both in-house and digitally, this book is specifically geared to my work with fellow educators. Many times, when I go into schools, teachers have not had much of an opportunity to meet in collegial groups, and they are satisfied with the “island mentalities” they have been allowed to cultivate over many years. This leads to not only missed opportunities, but also to feelings of inadequacy and a sense of constantly being under attack for failing to do this or that.

Easton’s career includes 15 years as a teacher, and long service as a curriculum leader and professional developer in Arizona and Colorado, including work with the Coalition of Essential Schools. In her introduction, she promises that through the use of protocols, teacher communities can “achieve trust and create a culture that is essential for collaborative work on issues of substance.” Schools can’t wait for a perfect culture to begin using protocols, she says. Instead, “it is through their use that the culture will develop and trust will emerge.”

Protocols, Easton tells us, are:
• Processes that help groups achieve deep understanding through dialogue.

• Structures for groups that allow them to explore ideas deeply through student work, artifacts of educator practice, texts relating to education, or problems and issues that surface during the day-to-day lives of educators.

• Guidelines for conversation based on norms that everyone agrees upon in order to make the dialogue safe and effective.

• A facilitated set of steps which everyone understands and has agreed to that permits a kind of conversation that people don't usually have when they discuss things.

• A constructivist approach to discussion that allows for deep development of ideas as certain people talk while others listen and then the talkers listen and the listeners talk, with each round characterized by reflection and exploration.

• A way for educators to build collaborative communities, sometimes called critical friends groups (CFGs) or professional learning communities (PLCs).
Over the course of six chapters, Easton then explores the whats and whys of protocols and how they can be put to use to examine student work and professional practice, to address learning issues and problems, and to promote effective professional discussions. Each chapter describes various protocols in step-by-step detail. (See sample chapters here.)

The protocols in this book help to inspire the atmosphere and culture of trust and collegiality that is necessary to open and maintain conversations among teachers. When there is a framework of understanding, and a foundation of value for everyone’s participation and unique voice, it helps everyone move forward.

Besides the great examples she describes, Easton creates a defining framework around protocols and how they should be used. This supplies teachers and meeting leaders with detailed tools from which they can choose to facilitate different types of gatherings, whether the purpose is to share ideas, analyze a specific problem, or deal with something unpleasant in an honest but supportive way.

I especially liked that the author included a section on protocols to use with students. I am always being asked what I think about the peer review or peer collaboration process and what resources I have. Using protocols is a perfect way to examine, review, revise and discuss student work. The protocols listed facilitate both student to student interactions and teacher to student interactions.

This book also contains protocols for examining professional practice and for addressing issues and problems. Out of these, I found the Success Analysis protocol to be immediately useful, and have used it several times in professional development recently with wildly successful results. In fact, I just proposed to another staff developer that she may want to include a reference in her new book to this particular tool, as the content she is writing about is quite conducive to using protocols.

Overall, I see Protocols for Professional Learning as very necessary to the field and unique in its delivery. It’s short (70 pp.) and to the point and written in such a way as to be immediately useful to practitioners, be they teachers or administrators. It could also be useful, in part, to students, as they construct ways to be mutually supportive but also understand that all voices are necessary and needed. I was impressed and excited by what I read, and look forward to more from Lois Brown Easton and ASCD’s Professional Learning Community series.

Tuesday, October 13, 2009

More "Data Informed" Conversation...

Today I read a posting on a popular Social Networking site that was a response to a teacher saying he was not looking forward to an upcoming workshop, as it dealt primarily with data. The response said, and I quote, "I don't like the data workshops either, I'm a teacher, I didn't sign up for all that data stuff."

It made me think.

In the evenings, perhaps in the mornings if I wasn't ready the night before, I check the weather forecast to decide what I'm going to wear. I don't want to be uncomfortable if the weather calls for, say, a sweater, and I choose to wear a thin, short sleeve button up.

I also tend to check the traffic report. If I know the highway is backed up, I plan an alternate route to my destination before I ever leave the house.

On Sunday's, we get all the coupons in the paper and as my wife and I sort through them, we try to make informed decisions about where we will shop that week to get the best deal on the products and foods we use.

Does any of this sound familiar? We all make dozens, if not hundreds, of data informed decisions on a daily basis. Rain in the forecast? Perhaps I should mow the yard today. Is that the mailman in the distance? Perhaps if I hustle, he can take this letter so that I don't have to drive to the Post Office. Could that icy glare from my wife signal that I may have said the wrong thing? Perhaps flowers would be a good idea today!

Wisdom guides us to make decisions based on circumstances and previous experiences. It's thinking. It's cause and effect. It's human.

Why would someone not want that same mode of thinking to have an impact on instruction? If we KNOW that a kid is struggling with the understanding of a particular skill, why would we not target instruction toward proficiency in that area? If we know that a group of students is bored with what we're doing, because it's below their high cognitive level, how hard is it, really, to find something that will challenge those students?

It's not easy. Nothing worthwhile ever is. And if you are not overjoyed with numbers and what they show, it can be mundane and tedious. But it's still important. Vitally important. As important as water to fish.

Think about it. If you go to the doctor and have a bunch of tests; don't you expect the doctor to pore over those numbers to determine the best course of treatment for whatever ails you? Sure, he could choose to be as "fair" as possible, I mean, he didn't "sign up to deal with all this data stuff;" he just wanted to help people. But if he's fair, and does the same thing for everyone--aspirin, for instance, then everybody with a headache or minor affliction is okay the next morning. But everybody else is dead.