tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5472338580684897991.post396213576752689850..comments2024-03-10T23:46:28.156-07:00Comments on Digigogy: Continuing the Digital / Visual Bloom's ConversationFisherhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04498370935470524251noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5472338580684897991.post-34730292404613336362009-03-08T18:31:00.000-07:002009-03-08T18:31:00.000-07:00I think this is an awesome concept, Mike. I am th...I think this is an awesome concept, Mike. I am thinking however (and I believe I read somewhere) that many of the stages of Blooms are not a hierarchy any longer. Yes, the knowledge and basic understanding level might be foundational, however, after that I believe that any of the stages can extend that thinking at several different levels. For example, I can have a superficial analysis or a deep, insightful analysis. I can apply the knowledge in a literal way or stretch my application in an obscure yet appropriate way. So I'm not sure what the visual would look like. Maybe the Knowledge, Comprehension foudation with all the other stages on top of the foundation side-by-side but showing different levels as they go up. Some of the tools you have listed belong into several categories. For example, I could use voicethread as an evaluation tool for students to leave comments for other student's work. I could list it under analysis as the comments could analyze a piece of work without evaluating. Do you see what I mean? Not to throw a wrench into your idea because I think it is awesome, but maybe the format can be reworked. The key is to allow for the complex but keep it simple enough to understand at first glace.Nancyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14727220378145852081noreply@blogger.com